AI

AI review that shows its working.

AuditHD's AI reviewer helps auditors write better workpapers and findings, faster. Every suggestion cites the clause and the evidence it relies on, is marked as AI, and needs a person to accept it.

AI that cites the clause, and waits for an auditor.

AuditHD's AI reviewer reads the checklist item, the evidence and the requirement, then suggests what to fix. It never issues a finding, closes an action or changes a record on its own.

  • Checks that each result, note and piece of evidence agree.Available now
  • Flags vague root causes like "human error", and spots repeat findings.Available now
  • Drafts findings, checklists and committee summaries for you to edit.Available now
  • Translates between English and Arabic.Available now
Finding quality check: the AI flags a root cause that reads as a symptom and links a possible repeat finding.
The quality check flags "human error" as a symptom and links a similar finding from last year.

Six jobs it does well.

Available now in the product todayAI review is an optional module; the rules engine works without it.

  • Review a checklist answer. Checks that the result, the note and the evidence agree, and that the evidence is final, dated and relevant.
  • Draft a finding. Turns a failed item and its evidence into condition, criteria, cause, effect and recommendation.
  • Check a finding's quality. Flags causes that are really symptoms, missing criteria, vague recommendations and repeat findings.
  • Draft a checklist. From the requirements you select or a short description of the review.
  • Translate. Between English and Arabic, keeping clause references intact.
  • Summarise an engagement. A draft executive summary for the audit committee.
An AI suggestion on a checklist item, marked "review before use", with the evidence it checked.
Every suggestion is marked as AI and waits for a decision.

Built for regulated work.

Audit evidence is confidential and findings carry weight. The AI is designed around that.

A person always decides

Suggestions are drafts. Nothing is issued, closed or changed until an auditor accepts it, and discarding is one click.

Available now

Citations are checked

Every reference and quote in a suggestion is checked against the real requirement and evidence text and marked verified or not, so an invented citation stands out.

Available now

Labelled as AI

AI content is visibly marked in the interface and in the record, in line with transparency rules such as the EU AI Act.

Available now

Logged either way

Each suggestion is recorded with the model, the time and the person's decision, so you can show how AI was used.

Available now

Personal data redacted

Before text goes to a cloud model, IBANs, card numbers, national IDs, phone numbers and email addresses are masked.

Available now

Rules engine fallback

With AI switched off, built-in rules still check workpapers and findings. Nothing depends on a model being available.

Available now

You decide where the model runs.

An administrator sets the hosting policy for the whole organisation. The policy is enforced on every request.

Off

Only the rules engine. Suitable for the strictest environments.

Available now

On-premises only

Open models such as Qwen or Llama on your own GPU server through Ollama or vLLM. Requests to any public address are refused.

Available now

In-country cloud

A provider hosted in your country with an OpenAI-compatible interface.

Available now

Any approved

Anthropic Claude, OpenAI or Azure OpenAI, with personal data redacted first.

Available now

API keys you enter are stored encrypted (AES-256-GCM). Check with your compliance function before enabling any provider outside your country; in Saudi Arabia, for example, SAMA expects approval for cloud services and for data processed abroad.

A quality check that knows audit.

The finding check reads like a senior reviewer. It knows that "human error" is rarely a root cause, that criteria should cite a requirement, and that a finding seen last year deserves a higher rating.

Finding quality check with a score out of 100 and two points: a cause that reads as a symptom, and a possible repeat finding.
A score out of 100, with each point linked to the field it concerns.

See it with your own checklists.

Open the live demo now, or book a walkthrough and we will load one of your frameworks or work programmes.